Trump’s Attack on Medicare for All Has Industry Fingerprints All Over It

By Wendell Potter, TRUTHOUT

Recently, the president decided to take a break from tweeting conspiracy theories to write an op-ed attacking supporters of Medicare for All. While engaging in what psychologists would probably call “projection,” he accused the Medicare for All movement of putting seniors at risk, rationing health care and trying to destroy the Medicare system.

I’m a former executive at two of the country’s largest insurance companies. I spent 20 years working in PR for Humana and then Cigna, rising to the level of vice president before I had a crisis of conscience. As a result, I know exactly how this op-ed came to be. The process doesn’t start at the White House. It didn’t include a careful review of policy, and it wasn’t an idea his staff came up with.

Read More
Daniel Barlow
CNBC: 70% of Americans now support Medicare-for-all—here's how single-payer could affect you

CNBC

Yoni Blumberg@YoniBlum 

 1:05 PM ET Tue, 28 Aug 2018

The vast majority of Americans, 70 percent, now support Medicare-for-all, otherwise known as single-payer health care, according to a new Reuters survey. That includes 85 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of Republicans. Only 20 percent of Americans say they outright oppose the idea.

"Medicare is a very popular program, so the idea of expanding it to everyone is popular as well," Larry Levitt, senior vice president for health reform at the Kaiser Family Foundation, tells CNBC Make It. "The advantage of Medicare-for-all, which is much closer to how the rest of the world provides health care to their residents, is that you can achieve universal coverage at a lower cost."

Read More
Daniel Barlow
Why the Healthcare Justice Movement is Just Getting Started in California and Beyond.

Courtesy Medium

By Paul Y. Song, MD

Physicians for a National Health Program & The Campaign for a Healthy California

Jul 29

As the sun begins to set on California’s two-year legislative session, it will officially signal the death of the Healthy California Act better known as SB562. After Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon called SB562 “woefully incomplete” and banished it into legislative purgatory, it became quite obvious when none of its original co-sponsors or any other elected official emerged to fight on its behalf, that this would be its ultimate fate.

For all the “woefully incomplete” arguments made against 562 of it not having a funding mechanism, being dependent on federal waivers, and costing too much, Sacramento needs to explain its own hypocrisy. Why did the same assembly take up AB 1184 without providing any funding mechanism? Why did Sacramento rubber stamp Governor Brown’s fiscally irresponsible and grossly over-budget bullet train project and initiate construction without the guaranteed federal dollars and waivers that are desperately needed to complete it? How can Sacramento continue to call SB562 too expensive while ignoring the fact that our state already spends $368 Billion a year on healthcare of which 71 cents is already paid for by California taxpayers? And how can Sacramento continue to ignore and fail to address State Controller Betty Yee’s latest report of a $91.5 Billion unfunded healthcare retiree liability which increased $14 Billion from the year before, or our states’ $24 Billionannual school retiree healthcare liability?

Read More
Daniel Barlow
New York Times: Single-Payer Health Care in California: Here’s What It Would Take

By Patricia Cohen and Reed Abelson

New York Times

  • May 25, 2018

  • All the leading Democratic contenders in the June 5 primary have pledged support for a single-payer system run by the state. The front-runner, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, the former mayor of San Francisco, has made it the centerpiece of his campaign.

“There’s no reason to wait around on universal health care and single-payer in California,” he has declared.

Even beyond California, many Democrats are hoping to energize supporters by taking a cue from Bernie Sanders’s 2016 presidential campaign, which embraced a single-payer system, “Medicare for All.” But the idea primarily functions as a rallying cry.

“Voters are thinking about the fundamental values associated with single-payer,” said Kelly Hall, an independent health consultant who works with the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers in California, which has endorsed Mr. Newsom. “Almost zero voters have thought about the policy implications.”

Read More
Daniel Barlow
Kaiser Health Tracking Poll – March 2018: Views on Prescription Drug Pricing and Medicare-for-all Proposals

Majority support Medicare for all

Ashley Kirzinger Follow @AshleyKirzinger on TwitterBryan Wu, and Mollyann Brodie Follow @Mollybrodie on Twitter
Published: Mar 23, 2018

Key Findings:

  • The March Kaiser Health Tracking Poll finds that more than a year into President Trump’s presidency, half of the public (52 percent) say passing legislation to bring down the price of prescription drugs should be a “top priority” for President Trump and Congress. Yet, less than half of the public (39 percent) say they are confident that President Trump and his administration will be able to deliver on the promise that Americans will pay less for prescription drugs than they pay now.

    72% of Americans say drug companies have too much influence in Washington – more than say the same about the National Rifle Association

  • Pharmaceutical companies rank among the top organizations that the public – including majorities of Democrats, independents, and Republicans – say has “too much influence” in Washington. Seven in ten (72 percent) say pharmaceutical companies have “too much influence,” which is similar to other entities like large businesses and Wall Street, but much higher than the shares of the public who say the National Rifle Association (NRA), hospital groups, or doctors groups have “too much influence” (52 percent, 36 percent, 30 percent, respectively). There is stronger agreement among partisans on the influence of pharmaceutical companies with majorities of both Democrats (65 percent) and Republicans (74 percent) saying pharmaceutical companies have “too much influence” in Washington.

Read More
Daniel Barlow
Charlie Munger: Health-care providers 'are artificially prolonging death so they can make more money'

Berkeley Lovelace Jr. | @BerkeleyJr

Published 8:50 AM ET Mon, 7 May 2018  Updated 9:25 AM ET Mon, 7 May 2018CNBC.com

  • The U.S. health-care system is "shot through with rampant waste," Charlie Munger tells CNBC.

  • "A lot of the medical care we do deliver is wrong," he says.

  • He claims, "A lot of our medical providers are artificially prolonging death so they can make more money."

Munger: Health-care system is shot through with rampant waste  5:32 PM ET Mon, 7 May 2018 | 05:33

The U.S. health-care system is "shot through with rampant waste" and has become "immoral," billionaire investor Charlie Munger told CNBC on Monday.

"A lot of the medical care we do deliver is wrong — so expensive and wrong. It's ridiculous," Munger, a vice chairman at Berkshire Hathaway, said in a "Squawk Box" interview. "A lot of our medical providers are artificially prolonging death so they can make more money," he claimed.


Read More
Daniel Barlow
California Health Care Reform and the Impacts on Your Businesses Event at UCLA

California Health Care Reform and the Impacts on Your Businesses
Thursday, June 7, 2018
6:30 PM - 8:30 PM
UCLA Anderson, Room B301 (map ) 
110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA

Register HERE

The US spends over 17% of GDP on health care vs 9% for the average of OECD countries, without better outcomes!

  • Do you suffer with the cost of individual insurance plans?

  • Do you struggle with providing health care coverage for your employees?

  • Do you cringe at the rising personnel burden due to annual premium increases?

  • Do you think Covered CA plans are too expensive and not viable over the long term?

If you answered yes to any of the above, join us for a panel discussion followed by Q&A to be moderated by Bruce Willison, UCLA Anderson Dean Emeritus.

Panelists will include: 

  • Professor Deborah Freund from the School of Social Science, Policy & Evaluation at Claremont Graduate University

  • Dr. Paul Y Song, Physician, Biotech Exec and President of the CA Chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program

  • Dan Geiger, Business Consultant and Co-Director of the Business Alliance for a Healthy California.

Come hear about the current state of health care in the US, both cost and benefit.  Consider the impacts on businesses both large and small, including sole-proprietorships and entrepreneurs.  Learn about proposals within the State of California to reduce cost and improve access while maintaining quality of care, including the possible establishment of a single payer health care system.  Become a better informed voter in November!


Enjoy Early Bird Discount now through 5/8! 
Food, beer, wine, and powerful content guaranteed!
 

Read More
Daniel Barlow
Will California fail financially without single-payer health care? Candidates for governor disagree

BY ANGELA HART

SACRAMENTO BEE

ahart@sacbee.com​​​​​​​

April 24, 2018 12:01 AM

Updated 3 hours 5 minutes ago

Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, the frontrunner for California governor says he "doesn't see an alternative" to a taxpayer-financed single-payer health care system run by state government.

If California doesn't drastically reshape the way health care is financed and delivered, he said, soaring health care costs will create a fiscal emergency that could bankrupt the nation's wealthiest and most populous state.

"We're on a path to insolvency," Newsom said in an interview with The Sacramento Bee's Editorial Board this month. "This is the budget. It's not a gross overstatement to say what I just said – insolvency."

Read More
Daniel Barlow